Keith Self (R-TX)
To direct the Secretary of Defense to update the Critical Asset List of the Department of Defense to incorporate assets critical to the development, deployment, and operation of the Golden Dome missile defense system.
A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill directs the Secretary of Defense to update the Department of Defense Critical Asset List to include assets needed for the Golden Dome missile defense system. It points out that countries like China and Russia are aggressively developing advanced long-range, cruise, and hypersonic missiles that threaten the United States mainland. The legislation states that developing an Iron Dome for America system is critical to national security. It also requires the Secretary of Defense to revise the Defended Asset List to align with the Golden Dome system and prioritize assets based on specific criteria. Finally, the bill mandates a report to the congressional defense committees within 270 days detailing the updated asset lists, protection strategies, and risk assessments.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +5
Does this better protect the country from computer attacks?
The bill mandates risk assessments and mitigation measures including cybersecurity considerations for missile defense assets.
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill mandates a detailed report to congressional defense committees regarding asset lists, protection strategies, and risk assessments.
- Scored +5
Does this put more money into scientific research?
The initiative requires development and deployment of advanced space-based sensors, interceptors, and missile tracking technologies.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 1(c) requires the Secretary of Defense to update the Critical Asset List to incorporate assets critical to the development, deployment, and operation of the Golden Dome missile defense system. This could be considered positive because it aims to protect the United States from missile threats using space-based sensors, interceptors, and ground-based facilities.
-
Section 1(d) requires the Secretary of Defense to revise the Defended Asset List to align with the Golden Dome missile defense system and prioritize assets based on threat assessments and defensive resources. This could be considered a positive outcome because it focuses on prioritizing assets that are critical to intercepting ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles.
-
Section 1(e) requires a report to be submitted to the congressional defense committees detailing the updated lists, a protection strategy, and an assessment of risks including cybersecurity and supply chain security. This holds officials accountable by requiring them to report back to Congress on their deployment timelines and risk mitigation measures.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline potential negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — The bill mandates risk assessments and mitigation measures including cybersecurity considerations for missile defense assets. Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — Enhancing national missile defense and protection of critical infrastructure contributes broadly to the overall safety and security of military personnel and veterans. Does this strengthen ties with allied countries? — Addressing advanced missile threats from near-peer adversaries reinforces deterrence and cooperative defense postures.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates a detailed report to congressional defense committees regarding asset lists, protection strategies, and risk assessments. Does this give the federal government more power? — The legislation directs the Department of Defense to update critical asset lists and missile defense strategies for the entire nation.
- Education And Technology
- Does this put more money into scientific research? — The initiative requires development and deployment of advanced space-based sensors, interceptors, and missile tracking technologies.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Strengthening national defense and homeland security enhances the safety and protection of military veterans and active-duty personnel alike.
- 10/6/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Introduced in House