Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR)
Artificial Intelligence Education and Workforce Readiness Act of 2026
A Democratic bill with 8 Democratic cosponsors · See all 8 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Science, Space, and Technology, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The bill establishes a Federal framework for artificial intelligence in education and the workforce to promote ethical teaching and learning, workforce development, and data privacy. It creates interagency councils and grant programs to support AI-disrupted career pathways, micro-credentials, and reskilling initiatives. The legislation mandates compliance with risk management frameworks, bias and accessibility testing, and strict data security protocols to protect students and workers. Additionally, it addresses the environmental impacts of AI infrastructure and requires transparency regarding energy and water consumption.
Yes· 3 of 36
- Scored +7
Would students be better off under this?
Students receive enhanced AI literacy education, better teacher training, and robust data privacy protections.
- Scored +7
Does this put more money into public schools?
Title I and Title III authorize significant funding and grant programs to incorporate AI literacy, ethics, and teacher training into public schools and higher education.
- Scored +7
Does this give people more control over their personal data?
Title V and Section 6 establish strict data breach notification portals, privacy protections, and prohibitions on selling student data.
The opposite
- Scored -4
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?
The bill authorizes substantial new appropriations across multiple federal titles to fund AI education, workforce grants, and research programs.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 101 and Section 204 establish grant programs for AI-disrupted career pathways and apprenticeships that include paid work-based learning, which benefits individuals by helping them gain skills and credentials for in-demand occupations while receiving wages or stipends.
-
Section 208 provides an artificial intelligence reskilling tax credit for employers, which encourages businesses to invest in training programs for their workers to help them transition into or retain jobs in AI-impacted industries.
-
Section 301 and Section 302 authorize grant programs to promote equitable access to AI education in schools and build capacity in minority-serving institutions, which helps expand educational opportunities for underserved communities, women, first-generation college students, and low-income individuals.
-
Section 404 mandates community transparency and environmental disclosure by requiring artificial intelligence infrastructure operators to provide plain-language summaries of projected energy and water consumption to the local communities where their facilities are sited.
-
Section 504 limits the exclusive reliance on automated decision systems in workforce programs by requiring human oversight, pre-deployment testing for discriminatory impacts, and the right for participants to seek human review of decisions.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 6 and Section 404 impose compliance requirements, data security programs, mandatory reporting procedures, and disclosure mandates on entities receiving funds and AI infrastructure operators, which could create administrative burdens and compliance costs for schools, local governments, and businesses.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would students be better off under this? — Students receive enhanced AI literacy education, better teacher training, and robust data privacy protections. Would Black Americans be better off under this? — Title III provides targeted capacity-building grants for minority-serving institutions, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Would children be better off under this? — Schools benefit from curriculum grants, AI literacy programs, and robust student data privacy safeguards. Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this? — Grants support Hispanic-Serving Institutions and ensure equitable access to AI education and workforce pathways. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Grant programs prioritize underserved communities, offering stipends, childcare assistance, and tuition support for low-income individuals. Would people in middle age be better off under this? — Incumbent workers receive reskilling credits, training, and transition support to adapt to changing job markets. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — Tribal Colleges and Universities receive dedicated support to develop AI curricula that respect cultural data governance. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — Young adults gain access to modern career pathways, stackable micro-credentials, and apprenticeships in AI-augmented fields. Would business owners be better off under this? — Employers benefit from workforce reskilling tax credits, training grants, and structured industry partnerships. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Workers across skill levels gain access to reskilling opportunities and training programs that improve job security. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Grant programs prioritize rural institutions and communities, helping bridge technological and educational gaps. Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — Veterans benefit from general workforce development, reskilling programs, and equity initiatives. Would women be better off under this? — Programs specifically promote the recruitment and advancement of women in AI-augmented occupations and educational tracks. Would immigrants be better off under this? — Multilingual educational resources and equitable access programs assist immigrant communities in participating in workforce training. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Regional workforce and environmental transparency initiatives apply broadly to urban and suburban populations. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Broader educational initiatives and community transparency frameworks generally benefit the public interest.
- Education And Technology
- Does this give people more control over their personal data? — Title V and Section 6 establish strict data breach notification portals, privacy protections, and prohibitions on selling student data. Does this put more money into public schools? — Title I and Title III authorize significant funding and grant programs to incorporate AI literacy, ethics, and teacher training into public schools and higher education. Does this put more rules on large technology companies? — The bill imposes strict compliance rules, risk management frameworks, and transparency mandates on AI developers, deployers, and integrators. Does this put more money into scientific research? — The legislation authorizes substantial funding for research grants on AI education, ethics, and environmental impacts through the National Science Foundation. Does this make college cost less? — Scholarships, micro-credential programs, and institutional grants help reduce financial barriers for students pursuing AI-related education. Does this get reliable internet to more people? — Grant programs for reskilling and career equity provide funding for internet access to participants from underserved communities.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — Title III establishes capacity-building grants for minority-serving institutions and programs promoting equitable access to AI education and careers. Does this expand the rights of people with disabilities? — Mandates for AI accessibility and technical assistance under Section 207 ensure individuals with disabilities can participate in AI-driven career paths. Does this narrow the gap between how men and women are treated? — The legislation targets equitable participation for women and underserved communities in AI-augmented occupations and educational pathways. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Support services, stipends, and targeted reskilling grants help lift lower-income individuals and displaced workers into higher-paying career pathways.
- Economy And Finance
- Is this likely to create jobs? — The bill establishes grant programs for AI-disrupted career pathways, apprenticeships, and reskilling initiatives that foster in-demand employment opportunities. Is this likely to grow the economy? — By investing in workforce development, reskilling, and AI readiness, the legislation promotes economic adaptability and growth in emerging industries. Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Grants and tax credits for reskilling and apprenticeships assist small businesses in training employees for AI-augmented occupations. Does this cut taxes for small businesses? — Section 208 provides a tax credit for employers investing in AI reskilling programs, which supports businesses engaging in workforce training. Does this reduce what the federal government spends? — The bill authorizes substantial new appropriations across multiple federal titles to fund AI education, workforce grants, and research programs.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — Title IV establishes community transparency, environmental disclosures, and measurement standards for energy and water consumption by AI infrastructure operators. Does this invest in rural communities? — Grants and regional programs explicitly prioritize rural areas and underserved communities to ensure equitable technological development. Does this put more money into wind, solar and other renewable power? — Research and accountability mandates concerning the environmental impacts of AI data centers encourage sustainable resource usage.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires comprehensive reporting on automated decision systems, data breaches, workforce displacement, and environmental energy consumption. Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts? — Section 504 mandates human oversight and the right to seek human review for decisions made by automated systems in workforce programs.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this better protect the country from computer attacks? — Title V and Section 6 impose strict data security programs, encryption requirements, and vulnerability reviews to protect sensitive records.
- 9/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/21/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Science, Space, and Technology, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Ted LieuDemocrat · California
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida