A Democratic bill with 33 Democratic cosponsors · See all 33 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the WIC for Kids Act and it changes the Child Nutrition Act of 1966. It extends certain certification periods for the special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children. The legislation updates eligibility rules and makes it easier for families to stay on the program. It was introduced in the House of Representatives on September 15, 2026.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +8
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The legislation expands WIC eligibility and reduces administrative hurdles for low-income families receiving assistance.
- Scored +7
Would children be better off under this?
The bill extends child certification periods to two years and provides continuous access to nutrition benefits for growing children.
- Scored +7
Would women be better off under this?
The bill supports pregnant and postpartum women by streamlining WIC certification and automatically certifying infants.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Longer certification periods for children: Under Section 2(d), the bill extends the child certification period from 1 year to 2 years. This is positive because it means families will not have to go through the renewal process as often, saving them time and keeping kids on the program longer without interruption.
-
Automatic certification for infants: Under Section 2(c), the bill adds clause (v) which states that a State shall certify for participation, without further application, an infant born to a pregnant individual who is participating in the program. This helps new parents by removing paperwork and ensuring newborns get nutrition help right away.
-
Expanded eligibility through household connections: Under Section 2(a), the bill expands eligibility so that individuals can qualify if someone in their household receives certain assistance, such as Head Start, food distribution on Indian reservations, or specific territorial nutrition assistance programs. This is positive because it helps more struggling families qualify for the WIC program through benefits they already receive.
-
Easier recertification for families: Under Section 2(c), the bill adds clause (iv) and clause (vi) to allow alignment of certification periods for family members and requires States to check for other eligibility before demanding new income paperwork. This reduces the burden on everyday people by cutting down on red tape and administrative hassle.
-
Inclusion of kinship families: Under Section 2(e), the bill updates Section 17(f)(1)(C)(ix) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to explicitly insert a kinship family regarding the care of children. This is a good thing because it ensures that grandparents and other relatives raising children are clearly covered and supported by the program.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
The provided text of the bill does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The legislation expands WIC eligibility and reduces administrative hurdles for low-income families receiving assistance. Would children be better off under this? — The bill extends child certification periods to two years and provides continuous access to nutrition benefits for growing children. Would women be better off under this? — The bill supports pregnant and postpartum women by streamlining WIC certification and automatically certifying infants. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The bill expands WIC eligibility and streamlines certification for postpartum women and infants. Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill explicitly includes households receiving assistance from food distribution programs on Indian reservations. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — Certain middle-income households may qualify if they receive other forms of public assistance like Medicaid or Head Start. Would people over 65 be better off under this? — Grandparents raising grandchildren in kinship families benefit from automatic eligibility provisions.
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/24/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/17/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 9/15/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 25 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Shontel BrownDemocrat · Ohio
Wesley BellDemocrat · Missouri
Janelle BynumDemocrat · Oregon
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Judy ChuDemocrat · California
Salud CarbajalDemocrat · California
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Debbie DingellDemocrat · Michigan
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
William KeatingDemocrat · Massachusetts
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
LaMonica McIverDemocrat · New Jersey
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California