Clay Fuller (R-GA)
White House Fellows Program Authorization Act
A Republican bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the White House Fellows Program Authorization Act. It creates a statutory basis for the White House Fellows Program, which was originally established by an executive order in 1964. The program gives outstanding United States citizens first-hand experience working at senior levels of the Federal Government. A commission will be established to recruit, screen, and recommend individuals for these fellowships. Fellows will serve 12-month terms as full-time employees in federal agencies and offices. The Office of Personnel Management will provide administrative and financial support for the program.
Yes
- Scored +5
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?
The program targets individuals early in their careers for professional development.
- Scored +5
Would students be better off under this?
The program provides high-level professional development and experience for degree holders.
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill codifies the program and requires annual reports to Congress, enhancing oversight.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 4(c)(2) establishes that members of the President's Commission on White House Fellowships shall be private citizens who are broadly representative of the regions, professions, and backgrounds of the Nation, and selected on a nonpartisan basis. This is positive because it ensures diverse representation and keeps politics out of the commission's work.
-
Section 5(c) explicitly prohibits discrimination in the selection of Fellows on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age, or political affiliation. This is a positive protection ensuring fair and equal opportunity for all qualified applicants.
-
Section 8 requires the Commission to submit an annual report to specific committees in the House of Representatives and the Senate detailing the number of Fellows selected, the agencies they were assigned to, an accounting of spent funds, and recommendations for improvements. This is a positive provision that holds officials accountable and keeps the public informed on how taxpayer money is used.
-
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 9 authorizes the appropriation of such sums as may be necessary to the Office of Personnel Management to carry out the Act for fiscal years 2027 through 2031. This could be viewed as a negative burden because it creates a new statutory spending authority funded by taxpayers.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would students be better off under this? — The program provides high-level professional development and experience for degree holders. Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this? — The program targets individuals early in their careers for professional development.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill codifies the program and requires annual reports to Congress, enhancing oversight.
- 9/3/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Introduced in House