A Democratic bill with 3 Republican cosponsors · See all 5 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Kids Safety on Set Act of 2026" requires criminal background checks for people working in the entertainment industry who have supervisory authority or frequent/private interaction with minors. These checks must include FBI Live Scan fingerprint clearance and focus on offenses involving violence, sex, stalking, or minors. The background check must be completed within 90 days before work begins, with costs not exceeding $100 paid by the entertainment entity. If an entity fails to comply, the Attorney General can seek significant civil penalties and halt production. This law applies to various entertainment forms but excludes journalism and Creative Commons works.
Yes
- Scored +9
Would children be better off under this?
Significantly increases safety for minors on sets by screening for violent and sex offenders.
- Scored +3
Does this give the federal government more power?
Grants the Attorney General authority to seek penalties and halt private productions.
The opposite· 3 of 5
- Scored -6
Would business owners be better off under this?
Production owners face extreme financial penalties and loss of investor rights for non-compliance.
- Scored -4
Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this?
High net worth investors may lose their right to be present on production sets.
- Scored -4
Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this?
High net worth investors may lose their right to be present on production sets.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Safety for Minors: The bill mandates that individuals with supervisory duties or frequent/private interaction with minors undergo criminal background checks specifically screening for offenses involving sex, violence, stalking, or minors (Section 2).
-
Financial Protection for Workers: The cost of the required background check is capped at $100 and must be paid for by the entertainment industry entity rather than the individual (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial Burden on Entertainment Entities: Entities that have employees in violation of the background check requirement may face civil monetary penalties of up to twice the total cost of the project's production activity (Section 3).
-
Disruption of Work: The Attorney General may seek temporary restraining orders or permanent injunctions to immediately halt all project production activity involving an employee who is in violation of the background check requirement (Section 3).
-
Loss of Ownership and Privileges: Individuals violating the act may have their special investor rights and privileges, including the right to be physically present during production, immediately and permanently revoked (Section 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — Significantly increases safety for minors on sets by screening for violent and sex offenders. Would business owners be better off under this? — Production owners face extreme financial penalties and loss of investor rights for non-compliance. Would billionaires be better off under this? — High net worth investors may lose their right to be present on production sets. Would people with substantial wealth be better off under this? — High net worth investors may lose their right to be present on production sets. Would the very wealthiest people be better off under this? — High net worth investors may lose their right to be present on production sets.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — Small entertainment entities may face significant financial risk due to severe civil penalties and potential production halts.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — Grants the Attorney General authority to seek penalties and halt private productions.
- 9/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Lauren BoebertRepublican · Colorado
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Young KimRepublican · California
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia