A Democratic bill with 1 Republican cosponsor · See the cosponsor
Last activity — Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the REACH Our Tribes Act. It sets up a formal process for the Department of Agriculture to consult with Tribal Governments regarding annual budgets and multi-year farm bills. The legislation requires the government to publicly report on program funding provided to Tribal entities. It creates an interagency task force to cut down the paperwork and burdens for economic development programs. Additionally, the bill directs the creation of a public, easy-to-find repository listing all federal economic development programs available to Tribes.
Yes· 3 of 12
- Scored +8
Would Native Americans be better off under this?
The bill provides significant benefits to Tribal governments through consultation, transparency, and economic development assistance.
- Scored +5
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?
The bill promotes equity for Tribal nations through formal consultation and improved access to economic assistance.
- Scored +5
Does this invest in rural communities?
The bill specifically targets economic development and consultation for Tribal entities, which often reside in rural areas.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2: This part requires the Department of Agriculture to consult with Tribal Governments at least annually on budget requests and farm bills. This is a positive step because it gives elected tribal leaders a direct voice in federal spending decisions that affect their communities.
-
Section 3: This section requires reporting on program funding and directs the government to find ways to improve outreach and technical assistance for underutilized programs. This helps ensure Tribal entities actually receive the financial support and resources they are eligible for.
-
Section 5: This creates an interagency task force to combine rules and reduce the administrative paperwork for applicants. This makes it much easier for people and communities to apply for economic development programs without drowning in red tape.
-
Section 6: This creates a working group to build a single public repository of all federal economic development programs available to Tribal entities. This is helpful because it allows communities to easily see what funding is available in one place instead of searching through multiple government agencies.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific provisions that create negative consequences, burdens, or harms for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would Native Americans be better off under this? — The bill provides significant benefits to Tribal governments through consultation, transparency, and economic development assistance. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — By targeting economic development and administrative reduction, it benefits rural tribal communities. Would business owners be better off under this? — The bill aids tribal-owned businesses by reducing administrative burdens. Would farmers be better off under this? — The bill impacts the Department of Agriculture, which oversees many farming programs that may impact Tribal agriculture. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Enhanced economic development programs can benefit low-income tribal communities. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The bill includes provisions for Urban Indian organizations.
- Social Issues And Justice
- Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated? — The bill promotes equity for Tribal nations through formal consultation and improved access to economic assistance. Is this likely to lift people out of poverty? — Improved access to economic development programs can aid in long-term poverty reduction for tribal communities.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this make it easier to run a small business? — By reducing administrative burdens and increasing program awareness, it supports tribal-owned businesses and organizations. Is this likely to grow the economy? — The bill supports tribal economic development through increased program awareness and reduced administrative burdens.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this invest in rural communities? — The bill specifically targets economic development and consultation for Tribal entities, which often reside in rural areas.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill mandates reporting on consultation processes and creates a public repository of economic programs.
- 9/1/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
3 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Nicholas LangworthyRepublican · New York