Derek Tran (D-CA)
Hazardous Materials Transparency Act
A Democratic bill with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Hazardous Materials Transparency Act," directs the Secretary of Defense to create guidance for community engagement and emergency preparedness at certain defense industrial facilities. These "covered facilities" perform work for Department of Defense contracts involving materials like explosives or toxic substances that could risk public safety. The guidance requires facilities to coordinate with local first responders and maintain communication with the community. Facilities must also establish ways for residents to voice concerns and provide public information on emergency procedures. Additionally, the Secretary of Defense must submit annual reports to congressional defense committees regarding the implementation of these rules and any significant incidents.
Yes· 3 of 7
- Scored +6
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?
The bill mandates better coordination and information sharing regarding hazardous materials and potential environmental incidents.
- Scored +5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?
The bill requires annual reports to Congress and provides mechanisms for public information access regarding safety risks.
- Scored +5
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The bill enhances safety through increased transparency regarding hazardous materials near residential areas.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Safety Coordination: Covered facilities would be required to maintain regular coordination with local emergency management, fire, and law enforcement agencies (Section 2(b)(1)).
-
Clearer Communication Channels: The bill requires facilities to designate a community liaison to talk with local officials and community members (Section 2(b)(2)).
-
Timely Incident Notification: Facilities must have procedures to notify local authorities and affected communities after a fire, explosion, or release that risks public health (Section 2(b)(3)).
-
Public Access to Safety Information: Residents would have access to information regarding emergency notification procedures and how to protect themselves (Section 2(b)(4)).
-
Community Engagement Opportunities: The bill mandates periodic outreach or briefings to keep local stakeholders informed about safety and preparedness (Section 2(b)(5)).
-
Voice for Concerned Citizens: Mechanisms must be established so community members can submit their questions or concerns about how a facility is operating (Section 2(b)(6)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly detailed in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Does this better protect air, water and wildlife? — The bill mandates better coordination and information sharing regarding hazardous materials and potential environmental incidents. Does this improve help for people hit by a disaster? — By requiring better coordination with first responders, the bill improves local emergency preparedness for industrial incidents.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see? — The bill requires annual reports to Congress and provides mechanisms for public information access regarding safety risks. Does this give the federal government more power? — The bill directs the Secretary of Defense to establish new guidance that facilities must follow.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — Residents in rural areas near defense facilities benefit from improved emergency notification and community engagement. Would people in cities be better off under this? — Urban residents living near defense facilities benefit from improved emergency notification and community engagement.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The bill enhances safety through increased transparency regarding hazardous materials near residential areas.
- 8/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Introduced in House