Russ Fulcher (R-ID)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission relating to "Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program".
A Republican resolution with 2 Republican cosponsors · See all 2 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule from the Federal Communications Commission. The rule in question is titled ``Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program''. By passing this resolution, Congress intends to strip the rule of any force or effect. This action is being taken under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 7
- Scored -5
Would children be better off under this?
The nullification of the E-Rate rule intended to address the homework gap negatively impacts children's access to educational digital resources.
- Scored -5
Would students be better off under this?
The reversal of the FCC rule limits the program's ability to support students in overcoming digital connectivity barriers.
- Scored -5
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?
The E-Rate program is critical for rural connectivity, and nullifying this rule hinders efforts to close the homework gap in these communities.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the FCC rule: The resolution states that the rule relating to ``Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program'' shall have no force or effect. This would prevent the implementation of the specific rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Impact on the E-Rate Program: Because the resolution seeks to disapprove the rule titled ``Addressing the Homework Gap Through the E-Rate Program'', the specific actions or changes intended by that rule would not take effect.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would children be better off under this? — The nullification of the E-Rate rule intended to address the homework gap negatively impacts children's access to educational digital resources. Would people in rural areas be better off under this? — The E-Rate program is critical for rural connectivity, and nullifying this rule hinders efforts to close the homework gap in these communities. Would students be better off under this? — The reversal of the FCC rule limits the program's ability to support students in overcoming digital connectivity barriers. Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — Reducing the scope of the E-Rate program via this disapproval disproportionately affects low-income households seeking digital equity. Would people in cities be better off under this? — The removal of this rule may limit future digital infrastructure support for diverse residential areas.
- Education And Technology
- Does this get reliable internet to more people? — By striking down the FCC rule intended to bridge the digital divide, the bill reduces efforts to improve reliable internet access for students.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution uses congressional authority to overturn a specific administrative rule issued by a federal agency.
- 11/20/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
August PflugerRepublican · Texas