Kathy Castor (D-FL)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2027; and Basic Health Program".
A Democratic resolution with 16 Democratic cosponsors · See all 16 cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The rule relates to the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2027; and Basic Health Program." If passed, the resolution would render the rule without any force or effect. This action is being taken under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code.
Yes
- Scored +2
Does this leave more decisions to the states?
By using congressional disapproval to strike down a federal agency rule, the resolution reasserts legislative authority over executive agencies.
The opposite
- Scored -5
Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act?
The resolution nullifies the 2027 benefit and payment parameters established under the Affordable Care Act.
- Scored -4
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?
The nullification of the rule may negatively impact healthcare access for low-income populations relying on the Basic Health Program.
- Scored -3
Would middle-income households be better off under this?
The removal of the 2027 benefit parameters could increase healthcare costs or reduce coverage stability for middle-income families.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Nullification of the HHS Rule: The resolution aims to ensure that the rule regarding "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, HHS Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters for 2027; and Basic Health Program" has no force or effect. This could be considered positive for those who oppose the parameters set forth in that specific rule.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Elimination of the Rule: By declaring that the rule submitted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services shall have no force or effect, the specific benefit and payment parameters for 2027 established in that rule would be prevented from taking effect.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would households on low incomes be better off under this? — The nullification of the rule may negatively impact healthcare access for low-income populations relying on the Basic Health Program. Would middle-income households be better off under this? — The removal of the 2027 benefit parameters could increase healthcare costs or reduce coverage stability for middle-income families.
- Healthcare
- Does this strengthen the Affordable Care Act? — The resolution nullifies the 2027 benefit and payment parameters established under the Affordable Care Act.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this leave more decisions to the states? — By using congressional disapproval to strike down a federal agency rule, the resolution reasserts legislative authority over executive agencies.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/18/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Steve CohenDemocrat · Tennessee
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Doris MatsuiDemocrat · California
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Jennifer McClellanDemocrat · Virginia
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Debbie Wasserman SchultzDemocrat · Florida