Vicente Gonzalez (D-TX)
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Examinations for Risks to Active-Duty Servicemembers and Their Covered Dependents".
A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors
Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
In committee
Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.
The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.
Its path through Congress
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This joint resolution aims to provide congressional disapproval of a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question involves the withdrawal of a previous rule regarding "Examinations for Risks to Active-Duty Servicemembers and Their Covered Dependents." By passing this resolution, Congress would ensure that the rule submitted by the Bureau has no force or effect.
Yes
No question was scored yes.
The opposite· 3 of 4
- Scored -3
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?
The resolution disapproves a rule meant to address risks to active-duty servicemembers, which effectively removes a regulatory mechanism intended to protect them from financial risks.
- Scored -2
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?
The disapproval of the rule relating to examinations for risks to active-duty servicemembers may reduce the oversight intended to protect their financial well-being.
- Scored -2
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?
By disapproving the rule intended to monitor risks to active-duty servicemembers and their dependents, the resolution may weaken the oversight of financial risks facing those in service.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- There are no specific positive impacts or benefits for individuals or groups listed within the provided text.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- There are no specific negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups listed within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Tap or hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices? — The resolution disapproves a rule meant to address risks to active-duty servicemembers, which effectively removes a regulatory mechanism intended to protect them from financial risks.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together? — The disapproval of the rule relating to examinations for risks to active-duty servicemembers may reduce the oversight intended to protect their financial well-being.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive? — By disapproving the rule intended to monitor risks to active-duty servicemembers and their dependents, the resolution may weaken the oversight of financial risks facing those in service.
- Governance And Ideology
- Does this give the federal government more power? — The resolution uses congressional disapproval to nullify a rule submitted by a federal agency, thereby limiting that agency's regulatory reach.
- 5/7/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.