Brittany Pettersen (D-CO)

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Fair Credit Reporting; Permissible Purposes for Furnishing, Using, and Obtaining Consumer Reports".

H.J.Res. 165 · House resolution Finance and Financial Sector

A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This joint resolution seeks to express congressional disapproval of a specific rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The rule in question relates to the withdrawal of a previous rule regarding "Fair Credit Reporting; Permissible Purposes for Furnishing, Using, and Obtaining Consumer Reports." If passed, this resolution would ensure that the Bureau's rule has no force or effect.

Yes· 3 of 5

  • Scored +5

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    The resolution prevents the withdrawal of rules intended to regulate how consumer reports are furnished and obtained, maintaining consumer protections.

  • Scored +3

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    Maintaining credit reporting regulations helps protect low-income consumers from unauthorized use of their financial data.

  • Scored +3

    Would middle-income households be better off under this?

    The resolution upholds standards that regulate how consumer credit information is shared and utilized.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.