Cleo Fields (D-LA)

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B); Revocations or Unfavorable Changes to the Terms of Existing Credit Arrangements".

H.J.Res. 164 · House resolution Finance and Financial Sector

A Democratic resolution with no cosponsors

Last activity — Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

In committee

Introduced and handed to a committee in the chamber it started in.

The committee holds it, and most bills are never heard from again. A hearing or a committee vote would be news; silence is the usual outcome, and it kills the bill without anyone voting against it.

Its path through Congress

  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

This joint resolution seeks to overturn a specific rule from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The resolution aims to express congressional disapproval regarding the withdrawal of a rule. This rule is titled "Equal Credit Opportunity (Regulation B); Revocations or Unfavorable Changes to the Terms of Existing Credit Arrangements." If passed, the specified rule would have no force or effect.

Yes· 3 of 9

  • Scored +5

    Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?

    The resolution prevents the withdrawal of rules that protect consumers from unfavorable changes to existing credit arrangements.

  • Scored +4

    Would households on low incomes be better off under this?

    Protecting the terms of existing credit arrangements provides financial stability for low-income households.

  • Scored +4

    Would middle-income households be better off under this?

    Preventing unfavorable changes to credit terms helps protect the assets and credit arrangements of middle-class families.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.